Karl Popper's thinking in The Logic of Scientific Discovery.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69821/rer.v2i2.20Keywords:
method of demarcationAbstract
With the object of analyzing the thought of the philosopher Karl Popper, it was carried out and presented through a qualitative methodological study and a documentary design, specifically in its subject: The Logic of Scientific Investigation, of which it was planted a critical analysis of its propuesta for it make scientist. One of the theories that has already proposed a scientific investigation and its logic is the Austrian philosopher Karl Popper, with its theory of falsification and its method of scientific demarcation to identify what science is and what it is not. This essay is close to the ideas of this philosopher, discussed on the pages of this book: The logic of Scientific Discovery one of our most important texts, published in 1934 which is used to understand my scientific practice. Critics oppose falsacionismo. Add a note to the pages that show a new scientific thought.
Downloads
References
Bunge, M. (2018). La ciencia: su método y su filosofía (Vol. 1). Laetoli.
Burke, P., & Arias, I. (2002). Historia social del conocimiento: de Gutenberg a Diderot. (No Title).
Gadamer, H (1998) Verdad y Método II. Ediciones Sígueme. Salamanca. España.
García, F. M. (2003). Popper, el contraste de hipótesis y el método crítico. Revista Cubana de Salud Pública, 29(1), 52-60. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttex&pid=S0864-34662003000100008&Ing=es&ting=es.
Jaramillo, L. G. (2003). ¿Qué es epistemología? Cinta de Moebio. Revista de Epistemología de Ciencias Sociales, (18). https://sabereseducativos.uchile.cl/index.php/CDM/article/download/26135/27433
Quintanilla P (2003) Conocimiento, demarcación y elección de teorías. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Perú.
Sanguineti M (2016) Tesina: Tipología de criterios de demarcación y problemas prácticos. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/58282513/tesina_latex-libre.pdf?1548748391=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DTipologi_a_de_Criterios_Demarcatorios_y.pdf&Uc
Soler C (2007) Los enunciados de base empírica a la luz de los métodos científicos detenidos por Karl Popper y Rudolf Carnap. Universidad de la Salle, Bogotá. http://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/filosofia_letras/7
Khun, T (1986) La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. Investigación económica, 28(111/112, 189-196. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42776917
Popper K (1980) La lógica de la investigación científica. Editorial Tecnos Madrid.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Eglée Herrera de Reyes (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
a. The authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows third parties to use the published work provided they acknowledge the authorship and the original publication in this journal.
b. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), provided they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) before and during the manuscript submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges and increased and faster citation of the published work.
